Literary spec fic
May 4th, 2010This all interestingly dovetails with my last post…on March 15 (really? I am that lazy a blogger, apparently).
During my stay at Hedgebrook (post on that TK, I swear), I had the pleasure of being in residence with a group of amazingly rad writers, most of whom were working in literary fiction (with the notable exception of a genius poet working in form and a delightful NF/screenwriter), who, after hearing my work, grilled me tenderly about WTF the difference was these days between literary and SFF–especially since my own work was so obviously informed by what is usually (wrongly, IMHO) considered the concerns of literary fiction over SFF (character, language vs. idea and plot). I, of course, went promising a reading list of SFF that I think effectively (and once and for all) blurs the lines between speculative and literary–which, being me, has slipped until right this freaking minute.
- The Scar, China Mieville
- City of Saints & Madmen or Veniss Underground, Jeff VanderMeer
- The Mount, Carol Emshwiller
- To Say Nothing of the Dog, Connie Willis
- Pump Six (stories), Paolo Bacigalupi
- Bonus! Any collection by John Kessel
May 4th, 2010 at 2:44 pm
I heard that Margaret Atwood has finally admitted she belongs to the dark side.I taught a book by her in my class this semester (Penelopiad) and when I looked up info for the obligatory “Meet the Author” lecture, I came across a more recent piece where she admitted that she writes genre fiction. I’m still not sure I agree with the distinctions she makes, but at least she is admitting that it’s complicated.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2005/jun/17/sciencefictionfantasyandhorror.margaretatwood
May 5th, 2010 at 8:19 am
Have you seen this article on Clarkeworld? It seems to discuss similar things.
http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/britt_05_10/
May 12th, 2010 at 11:29 pm
Anything by Harlan Ellison.
1984 & Animal Farm by George Orwell
Character and language are as integral to SFF as they are to “literary”. Saying otherwise is much like saying sucrose isn’t a sugar because it’s not fructose.
May 28th, 2010 at 4:24 am
Have you seen this article on Clarkeworld? It seems to discuss similar things.
http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/britt_05_10/